Australian Senator Andrew Bragg has met with United States Senator Cynthia Lummis to debate potential collaboration on cryptocurrency regulation between the 2 nations.

Senator Bragg is a crypto-friendly politician from the ruling Liberal Social gathering, a conservative center-right get together, that has been one of many driving forces behind a proposed forward-thinking regulatory scheme in Australia.

Final 12 months, he fronted the Senate Committee on Australia as a Expertise and Monetary Middle (ATFC), which tabled 12 extensive regulatory proposals referring to taxation, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and firm licensing. Two months later, Treasurer Josh Frydenburg outlined intentions to start implementing no less than six of the proposals by mid-2022.

Since then the proposals have been refined and packaged into the Digital Services Act, nonetheless, its implementation is up within the air. With the federal election set to happen subsequent month, it’s unclear if the act might be adopted if the opposition Labor get together is voted in, given it has yet to provide a concrete stance on the crypto sector.

Bragg spoke with Lummis — who is a known crypto proponent and Bitcoin (BTC) hodler — through a video name this week and advised Cointelegraph that the dialogue targeted primarily on the “alternatives for regulatory equivalents.”

Whereas he wouldn’t go into specifics, Bragg emphasised the significance of aligning on as many points as attainable with the U.S., given the historic partnership between the 2 nations:

“I see that as an financial progress space, as a safety goal, as a result of we’ve got a novel relationship with the US, which is cultural, financial and army. So, we wish to be near our buddies in the US on these points as a lot as we will.”

He additionally recommended that each governments wish to set world requirements for crypto regulation, noting that “the manager order from President Biden in all fairness just like what Treasurer Frydenberg launched final December.”

“If two giant and complex monetary economies like the US and Australia come collectively that would assist drive requirements in different components of the world,” he stated.

By way of collaboration, or no less than regulatory equivalence, Bragg famous that it “appears like they’ve been in a position to transfer extra shortly on getting different types of merchandise into the market. So, we’ll see what classes we would be capable of decide up there.”

Associated: Failure to launch: Australia’s first 3 crypto ETFs all miss launch day

One space which will differ is the 2 nations’ method to launching a central financial institution digital forex (CBDC), with Bragg noting that the U.S. appears extra receptive to the thought. Australia’s Reserve Financial institution has acknowledged there’s no compelling want for one due partially to the nation’s on the spot digital funds community, and Bragg harassed that he was “very cautious” about it at this stage.

“I believe I’m, you understand, most likely extra conscious of the problems and the dangers of going there. So, we simply must get the Treasury report achieved on this problem. I’m hoping that may be achieved, you understand, shortly after the election.”

When requested if Labor being voted in would derail Bragg’s efforts at crypto reform over the previous two years, the Senator frankly acknowledged that he had no thought.

“I imply, you’ll have to speak to Labor about it. However, they have not obtained any coverage. So, I actually hope not, however they haven’t any insurance policies,” he stated.

Bragg additionally delivered a speech on the Accounting Enterprise Expo in Sydney on Thursday, as he outlined his political events’ intention to offer “good regulation” versus stifling regulation:

“Regulation which creates certainty whereas inviting the potential for extra innovation, together with innovation which we can’t anticipate. Regulation which protects the pursuits of shoppers and traders on a degree enjoying discipline — whereas permitting for flexibility, inventiveness and experimentation.”

“Regulation which supplies a security web when the market fails however holds people accountable for the implications of their actions,” he added.